Bronze level automatically awarded GB final

This data has achieved Bronze level on 29 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

NI 197 Improved Local Biodiversity proportion of Local Sites where positive conservation management has been or is being implemented

Description

Improved Local Biodiversity proportion of Local Sites where positive conservation management has been or is being implemented. Source: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Publisher: DCLG Floor Targets Interactive Geographies: Local Authority District (LAD), County/Unitary Authority, Government Office Region (GOR), National Geographic coverage: England Time coverage: 2008/09

General Information

Legal Information

  • This data was

    originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement is at

    http://data.gov.uk/dataset/ni_197_improved_local_biodiversity_proportion_of_local_sites_where_positive_conservation_management_ Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data changes

    no Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Technical Information

Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release frequency Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know