Bronze level automatically awarded GB final

This data has achieved Bronze level on 28 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

Public bodies that have been closed as at 22 August 2012

Description

The Government’s Public Bodies Review in 2010 covered over 900 public bodies and was initiated to increase transparency and accountability, to cut out duplication of activity, and to discontinue activities which are simply no longer needed. The public bodies under review included Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPB), Public Corporations and Non-Ministerial Departments. The 2010 Review tested whether the bodies’ functions were needed and, if they were, whether each body should continue to operate at arm’s length from Government. This decision was based upon whether they met one or more of three tests: • Does it perform a technical function? • Do its activities require political impartiality? • Does it need to act independently to establish facts? As a result of the review, over 200 bodies are proposed for abolition, over 170 bodies will be merged into fewer than 80 bodies and a further 120 bodies will be retained but substantially reformed. The public bodies landscape will ultimately be reduced by over 300 bodies by the end of the Spending Review period in 2014-15. This list outlines the 106 public bodies that have already been abolished as of 22 August 2012

General Information

Legal Information

  • This data was

    originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement is at

    http://data.gov.uk/dataset/public-bodies-that-have-been-closed-as-at-22-august-2012 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Technical Information

  • This data is

    machine-readable Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The format of this data is

    a standard open format Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know