Bronze level automatically awarded GB final

This data has achieved Bronze level on 29 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

National Diabetes Inpatient Audit (NaDIA) - 2012

Summary

Type of release
a one-off release of a set of related datasets

Licence
UK Open Government Licence

Verification
automatically awarded

Release Date
28 August 2013
Modified Date
10 May 2014
Publishers
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Communications@hqip.org.uk
Keywords
Health, diabetes data audit 2012 inpatient hospital admissions
Temporal Coverage
17 September 2012 — 21 September 2012

Community verification

Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.

This certificate is automatically awarded.

Sign in to verify or report this certificate


Description

The National Diabetes Inpatient Audit (NaDIA) is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and delivered by the Health and Social Care Information Centre, working with Diabetes UK. The National Diabetes Inpatient Audit is a snapshot audit of diabetes inpatient care in England and Wales. The audit is set out to answer the following questions: Did diabetes management minimise the risk of avoidable complications? Did harm result from the inpatient stay? Was patient experience of the inpatient stay favourable? Has the quality of care and patient feedback changed since NaDIA 2010? This publication was produced in two parts: the comparative hospital-level analysis was published 14 March 2013 and the National Report was published 27 June 2013.


General Information


Legal Information

  • This data was

    originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement is at

    http://data.gov.uk/dataset/national-diabetes-inpatient-audit-nadia-2012 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Technical Information

  • This data is

    machine-readable Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The format of this data is

    a standard open format Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know