Bronze level automatically awarded GB final

This data has achieved Bronze level on 02 December 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

Focus on London - Income and Spending

Summary

Type of release
ongoing release of a series of related datasets

Licence
UK Open Government Licence

Verification
automatically awarded

Release Date
16 October 2010
Modified Date
17 September 2014
Update Frequency
Ad hoc
Publishers
Greater London Authority (GLA)
Keywords
expenditure, fol, income, spending

Community verification

Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.

This certificate is automatically awarded.

Sign in to verify or report this certificate


Description

**FOCUS**ON**LONDON**2010:**INCOME**AND**SPENDING**AT**HOME** Household income in London far exceeds that of any other region in the UK. At £900 per week, London’s gross weekly household income is 15 per cent higher than the next highest region. Despite this, the costs to each household are also higher in the capital. Londoners pay a greater amount of their income in tax and national insurance than the UK average as well as footing a higher bill for housing and everyday necessities. All of which leaves London households less well off than the headline figures suggest. This chapter, authored by Richard Walker in the GLA Intelligence Unit, begins with an analysis of income at both individual and household level, before discussing the distribution and sources of income. This is followed by a look at wealth and borrowing and finally, focuses on expenditure including an insight to the cost of housing in London, compared with other regions in the UK. See other reports from this Focus on London series. **REPORT:** To view the report online click on the image below. [Income and Spending Report PDF](https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/fol/FocusOnLondon2010-income-and-spending.pdf) ![Alt text](https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/fol/fol10-income-cover-thumb1.png) **PRESENTATION:** This interactive presentation finds the answer to the question, who really is better off, an average London or UK household? This analysis takes into account available data from all types of income and expenditure. Click on the link to access. [PREZI](http://prezi.com/kbsiudk48jaj/focus-on-london-2010-income-and-spending-at-home/) [The Prezi in plain text version](https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/fol/FoL2010-Income-presentation-transcript.doc) **RANKINGS:** ![Alt text](https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/fol/fol10-income-tableau-chart-thumb.jpg) This interactive chart shows some key borough level income and expenditure data. This chart helps show the relationships between five datasets. Users can rank each of the indicators in turn. [Borough rankings Tableau Chart](http://data.london.gov.uk/focus-on-london-income-and-spending/) **MAP:** These interactive borough maps help to geographically present a range of income and expenditure data within London. [Interactive Maps - Instant Atlas](http://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/instant-atlas/fol10-income-expenditure/atlas.html) **DATA:** All the data contained within the Income and Spending at Home report as well as the data used to create the charts and maps can be accessed in this spreadsheet. [Report data](https://londondatastore-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/fol/fol-2010-income-report-data.xls) **FACTS:** Some interesting facts from the data… ● Five boroughs with the highest median gross weekly pay per person in 2009: -1. Kensington & Chelsea - £809 -2. City of London - £767 -3. Westminster - £675 -4. Wandsworth - £636 -5. Richmond - £623 -32. Brent - £439 -33. Newham - £422 ● Five boroughs with the highest median weekly rent for a 2 bedroom property in October 2010: -1. Kensington & Chelsea - £550 -2. Westminster - £500 -3. City of London - £450 -4. Camden - £375 -5. Islington - £360 -32. Havering - £183 -33. Bexley - £173 ● Five boroughs with the highest percentage of households that own their home outright in 2009: -1. Bexley – 38 per cent -2. Havering – 36 per cent -3. Richmond – 32 per cent -4. Bromley – 31 per cent -5. Barnet – 28 per cent -31. Tower Hamlets – 9 per cent -32. Southwark – 9 per cent


General Information


Legal Information

  • This data was

    originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement is at

    http://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/focus-on-london-income-and-spending Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://data.london.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data changes

    no Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Technical Information


Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release frequency Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know