---

Description

** Important Note ** The Brownfield data was handed over from LDA to the Homes and Communities Agency so that HCA could maintain it as part of the National Land Use Database (NLUD). The HCA’s online mapping site displays a points only version of NLUD from 2010 (password protected): The links to the files below will remain here as a matter of historical record. Polygons showing the boundaries of Brownfield land in London along with their addresses. This database of Brownfield land replaces in more detail and accuracy the EP National Land Use Database (NLUD) for London. The current NLUD assessment covers sites in excess of 0.25ha. This project validates, checks and updates this information for existing NLUD sites plus new sites down to a smaller threshold of 0.1 hectares and above. The Database records over 2,000 Brownfield sites across London, equivalent to more than 2% of the land in Greater London (an increase of over 1,000 sites than recorded on the previous system). The Homes and Communities Agency will use the database as their preferred platform for boroughs to record brownfield sites. The London Database uses Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping. It includes transport routes, deprivation, social infrastructure, as well as heritage and natural environment assets that can be overlaid over the dataset of brownfield land. Visitors to the Database website can identify sites suitable for development, and better explore and understand a site’s context.

---

General Information

• This data is described at

  http://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-brownfield-sites-review Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• This data is published by

  Greater London Authority (GLA) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

---

Legal Information

• This data was

  originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The rights statement is at

  http://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-brownfield-sites-review Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• This data is available under

  UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• There are

  yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The content is available under

  UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• This data contains

  no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

---

Practical Information

• The data appears in this collection

  http://data.london.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• This data changes

  no Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

---

Technical Information

• Releases of this data are listed at

  http://data.london.gov.uk/api/rest/package/london-brownfield-sites-review Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• This data is

  machine-readable Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The format of this data is

  a standard open format Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

---

Social Information

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  release frequency Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

• The documentation includes machine-readable data for

  modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

---