Bronze level automatically awarded GB final

This data has achieved Bronze level on 28 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

Housing design quality in London, the South East and the East of England from CABE 2004

Summary

Type of release
ongoing release of a series of related datasets

Licence
UK Open Government Licence

Verification
automatically awarded

Release Date
24 March 2011
Modified Date
28 February 2014
Update Frequency
discontinued
Publishers
Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
Keywords
building-for-life, design, england, housing, housing-quality
Temporal Coverage
1 January 2001 — 1 January 2004

Community verification

Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.

This certificate is automatically awarded.

Sign in to verify or report this certificate


Description

An assessment of the design quality of 100 new housing schemes in London, the South East and the East of England. The assessment was carried out in 2004. The assessment is based on the Building for Life criteria. For each of the three Government Office regions, the top 10 house builders by volume were selected (based on most recent available data). For each top 10 house builder all schemes were completed between 1 Jan 2001 and 1 Jan 2004, over 20 units in size and of ‘Average’ Sales price. The attainable scores for each housing scheme varied from -48 (a ‘Poor’ standard scheme) to +48 (a ‘Very Good’ standard scheme). Each of the 16 audit criteria could receive a score of +3 to -3, which were added together to make up the total. Data for each housing scheme includes the housing scheme name, completion date, scores for individual criteria and total scores.


General Information


Legal Information

  • This data was

    originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement is at

    http://data.gov.uk/dataset/housing-design-quality-2004 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data changes

    no Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Technical Information


Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release frequency Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know