Bronze level automatically awarded GB final

This data has achieved Bronze level on 28 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

Housing design quality in the East Midlands, West Midlands and South West from CABE 2006

Summary

Type of release
ongoing release of a series of related datasets

Licence
UK Open Government Licence

Verification
automatically awarded

Release Date
24 March 2011
Modified Date
28 February 2014
Update Frequency
discontinued
Publishers
Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
Keywords
building-for-life, design, housing, housing-quality
Temporal Coverage
1 January 2003 — 1 August 2006

Community verification

Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.

This certificate is automatically awarded.

Sign in to verify or report this certificate

Description

An assessment of the design quality of 100 schemes in the East Midlands, West Midlands and South West. The assessment was carried out in 2006. Assessments were based on the Building for Life criteria. Schemes that were eligible for auditing included those that were larger than 20 units in size; completed between January 2003 and August 2006 (the date of the audit); and built by one of the top 10 housebuilders in the region, based on the number of units completed within the same period. Data on each scheme includes scheme name, location, developer, scores for individual Building for Life criteria and total scores. Six out of the 20 criteria which could not be assessed on site are incomplete, due to the poor response to a survey by developers.

General Information

Legal Information

  • This data was

    originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement is at

    http://data.gov.uk/dataset/housing-design-quality-2006 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data changes

    no Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Technical Information

Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release frequency Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

Create a certificate

Don't have an account?

Don't worry, you can register later to save your work.

Create an account